Limites subjetivos da coisa julgada coletiva na lei da ação civil pública

Abstract

This thesis aims to perform a critical approach on the content of art. 16 of the Law on Public Civil Action, ident ify their shortcomings as alteration suffered by Law n. 9.494/97, which imposed restrictive criteria for spatial res judicata conference. Initially, we traced a general profile of the evolutionary history of microsystem collective, with emphasis on the col lective Brazilian procedural system. Then we were recording the trans interests in kind, namely: diffuse, collective "strict sense" and homogeneous, and described their main features. After studied the phenomenon of procedural res judicata under individual and collective thirst. Finally, it was recorded that the legislative amendment above, plus innocuous is illegitimate because it does not meet the legal dictates, setting real setback in the struggle of interests metaindividual.